Product, platform, roadmap
Growth and retention claims tested against architecture maturity, release quality, and operational capacity.
TechDD provides independent UK technology due diligence for investors assessing software, SaaS, data, cloud, cyber, internal systems and integration risk. We screen targets, investigate the evidence that matters, and translate technical findings into valuation, deal-protection and post-close decisions.
Screen
Prioritise the M&A tech DD scope, buyer thesis, critical unknowns, and target-screening risks before deep access.
Investigate
Review code, architecture, security, data, delivery and team evidence against the deal thesis.
Decide
Convert buy-side technology due diligence findings into investment-committee language, SPA protections and 100-day actions.
2-3 Weeks
Deal-speed delivery
200+
Diligences completed
Deal Confidence Workflow
We turn diligence evidence into a board-ready view of risk, value creation, and what needs to happen next.
Underwrite platform
Validate growth claims across architecture and systems
Quantify execution risk
Prioritise findings with commercial impact
Plan integration
Convert findings into a board-ready 100-day roadmap
Deal diligence is a process, not a one-off report. We move with operators from first triage to post-close execution.
Buy-side validation of the technology estate for valuation, risk transfer, and execution assumptions.
Best for: PE, VC, and strategic acquirers buying into technology-dependent businesses
Cross-domain review of software, ERP, enterprise systems, cloud, cyber, DR, and data dependencies.
Best for: Broad technology estate audits before pricing, financing, or strategic partnerships
From signed deal to execution-ready plan with sequencing, owners, and dependency control.
Best for: Portfolio operators and board teams protecting value after close
Senior operator input on product, roadmap, team, and commercial delivery decisions.
Best for: Deal teams and boards that need practical technology judgement quickly
A full technology estate assessment for acquisition and advisory outcomes, with practical severity and execution framing.
Growth and retention claims tested against architecture maturity, release quality, and operational capacity.
Cloud and on-prem systems validated for resilience, scale, and dependency concentration.
Engineering evidence on speed, stability, debt, and maintainability at deal-relevant scale.
Core processes checked for hidden friction, integration readiness, and data consistency.
Controls, governance, and incident-readiness reviewed for transaction and operational risk.
Recovery assumptions stress-tested for uptime, recovery time, and business continuity.
Data lineage, usage rights, and model assumptions tied back to valuation and growth claims.
Team depth, ownership, and decision process benchmarked against execution targets.
System overlap, migration sequence, and sequencing risk surfaced for first-100-day planning.
The same framework applies across buy-side, sell-side, and post-close execution.
Deal confidence at investment tempo
You need a clear, defensible view of estate risk before terms lock. We validate value-creation assumptions and identify execution constraints early.
High-growth risk reduction
For founder-ops heavy deals, we focus on whether technology promises are supported by architecture, teams, and data assumptions under growth stress.
Integration-first outcomes
Corporate buyers need certainty on compatibility. We map systems, processes, and operating models so integration planning starts with evidence.
Control the narrative before the buyer does
From vendor readiness to sale prep, we help you test your own assumptions and structure findings into a credible, proactive process.
A structured framework for transaction work: evidence first, decision clarity second, value-creation actions third.
Stage 1
Confirm the real technical state behind valuation assumptions and growth claims.
Stage 2
Cross-check management narrative with systems evidence, release velocity, and team capability.
Stage 3
Prioritise what can break value during close and during the first 100 days.
Stage 4
Convert findings into a realistic, fund-level improvement roadmap.
Stage 5
Create an explicit sequencing plan for systems, data, and operations.
Deal outputs
Outputs are practical, board-facing, and tied to the next action. We make each finding useful in a live deal context.
Decision-ready narrative of risk, evidence, and recommended transaction stance.
High/medium/low register linked to business impact, not just technical labels.
Effort, timing, and team requirements presented for negotiation and planning.
Clear conditions and milestones for go, no-go, or proceed-with-protections outcomes.
First-100-days sequence with owners, dependencies, and integration checkpoints.
Cross-company sequence for systems, data, and people after close.
Practical context for advisors and transaction teams evaluating technology-dependent deals. If you are new to the workstream, start with how technology due diligence works before moving into checklists, red flags and deal-specific cost planning.
A practical guide to scope, sequencing, and decision outputs for transaction diligence.
A structured list for technical and operating risk checks before and during deals.
A seven-area scorecard for architecture, delivery, security, resilience, data, team and remediation risk.
Deeper practical notes on cost, integration, and what advisors and investors should know.
Common warning signs across software, systems, security, delivery, and technology operations.
A deeper lens for investors assessing SaaS product, platform, team, and growth readiness.
How scope, urgency, access, and complexity shape the cost of diligence work.
A practical guide on how to choose a technology due diligence provider without relying on generic rankings.
Don't wait until you're deep into the deal to discover tech troubles. Schedule a confidential consultation to discuss your upcoming transaction.
Schedule a CallEmail us at
hello@techdd.co.ukLocation
London, United Kingdom